noble 2023
Pre-Hire public safety officer screening: best practices & Remote testing
NOBLE 2023 PRESENTATION MATERIALS
- Tarescavage NOBLE 23 Powerpoint Slides
- IACP Pre-Hire Psychological Screening Guidelines
- IACP Fitness for Duty Evaluation Guidelines
- IACP Critical Incident Evaluation Guidelines
- California POST Background Investigator Manual
- California POST Pre-Hire Psychological Screening Manual
- Cochrane 2003 Survey of Police Departments
- Corey (2023) State Mandates for Pre-Hire Psychological Evaluations
IACP Guidelines
In the video below, I outline some of the most important information from the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Guidelines for Pre-Employment Screenings of Public Safety Officers. These guidelines indicate best practices for screening out candidates who may put public safety in jeopardy. They also identify the most defensible practices to protect agencies from legal liability.
I suggest chiefs consider asking the following questions about their assessment process to determine if it is in line with the IACP guidelines:
- Are your evaluations conducted after a conditional offer has been made to the candidate? (3.3)
- Are your evaluations conducted by licensed clinical psychologists trained in identifying mental disorders? (4.1)
- Are your evaluations conducted by psychologists specifically trained in pre-hire psychological evaluations of public safety officers? (4.3)
- Are your evaluations conducted by psychologists who are up to date with the research literature on psychological testing with police officers? (4.4)
- Have you provided your evaluators with a job description for the individuals they are assessing? (5.1)
- Are your evaluators reviewing test results before the interview? (7.4)
- Are the reports going only to someone directly involved in the hiring decision? (11.1)
- Are your evaluations based on on multiple sources of information (interview, background, and testing)? (11.4)
If the answer to any of these questions is “No,” then chiefs might consider updating their assessment process or finding a new service provider. If you are worried about locating one, remote testing makes it possible to receive evaluations from any experts who are licensed in your state.
Complementary Readings
Please see below for complementary scientific articles that I have written on best practices in psychological screening of public safety candidates:
- Tarescavage, Fischer, Cappo, Hill, Corey, & Ben-Porath (2015) MMPI-2-RF predictors of police officer problem behavior and collateral self-report test scores
- Tarescavage, Corey, Gupton, & Ben-Porath (2015) MMPI-2-RF Scores in Honolulu Police Department
- Tarescavage, Corey, & Ben-Porath (2015) A Prorating Method for Estimating MMPI-2-RF Scores from MMPI Responses
- Tarescavage, Corey, & Ben-Porath (2014) MMPI-2-RF Scores in Portland Police Bureau
- Tarescavage, Brewster, Corey, & Ben-Porath (2015) MMPI-2-RF Predictors of Police Officer Supervisor Ratings
- Roberts, Tarescavage, Ben-Porath, & Roberts (2019) Predicting Postprobationary Job Performance of Police Officers
- Ben-Porath, Corey, Tarescavage (2017) Police Screening with MMPI-2-RF Book Chapter
Remote Psychological Screenings
In the video below, I briefly explain how remote psychological evaluations work. If conducted properly, they provide the same quality of information as a traditional face-to-face evaluation.